<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>持久化 on Answer</title>
    <link>https://answer.freetools.me/tags/%E6%8C%81%E4%B9%85%E5%8C%96/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 持久化 on Answer</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.152.2</generator>
    <language>zh-cn</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 12:34:44 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://answer.freetools.me/tags/%E6%8C%81%E4%B9%85%E5%8C%96/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>关键日志为何总在崩溃时消失：从内存缓冲到持久化存储的四十年技术博弈</title>
      <link>https://answer.freetools.me/%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%97%A5%E5%BF%97%E4%B8%BA%E4%BD%95%E6%80%BB%E5%9C%A8%E5%B4%A9%E6%BA%83%E6%97%B6%E6%B6%88%E5%A4%B1%E4%BB%8E%E5%86%85%E5%AD%98%E7%BC%93%E5%86%B2%E5%88%B0%E6%8C%81%E4%B9%85%E5%8C%96%E5%AD%98%E5%82%A8%E7%9A%84%E5%9B%9B%E5%8D%81%E5%B9%B4%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%8D%9A%E5%BC%88/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 12:34:44 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://answer.freetools.me/%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%97%A5%E5%BF%97%E4%B8%BA%E4%BD%95%E6%80%BB%E5%9C%A8%E5%B4%A9%E6%BA%83%E6%97%B6%E6%B6%88%E5%A4%B1%E4%BB%8E%E5%86%85%E5%AD%98%E7%BC%93%E5%86%B2%E5%88%B0%E6%8C%81%E4%B9%85%E5%8C%96%E5%AD%98%E5%82%A8%E7%9A%84%E5%9B%9B%E5%8D%81%E5%B9%B4%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%8D%9A%E5%BC%88/</guid>
      <description>深入解析日志系统的核心设计困境。从1980年代Eric Allman发明syslog协议，到现代Log4j2使用LMAX Disruptor实现每秒数百万次日志写入；从Uber的169:1压缩比日志系统，到异步日志在应用崩溃时丢失关键信息的根本原因。系统梳理同步与异步日志的性能权衡、缓冲区设计策略、以及如何在性能与可靠性之间做出正确的工程决策。</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Write-Ahead Log：数据库如何在断电瞬间守住数据最后一道防线</title>
      <link>https://answer.freetools.me/write-ahead-log%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%BA%93%E5%A6%82%E4%BD%95%E5%9C%A8%E6%96%AD%E7%94%B5%E7%9E%AC%E9%97%B4%E5%AE%88%E4%BD%8F%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E6%9C%80%E5%90%8E%E4%B8%80%E9%81%93%E9%98%B2%E7%BA%BF/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 05:37:30 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://answer.freetools.me/write-ahead-log%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%BA%93%E5%A6%82%E4%BD%95%E5%9C%A8%E6%96%AD%E7%94%B5%E7%9E%AC%E9%97%B4%E5%AE%88%E4%BD%8F%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E6%9C%80%E5%90%8E%E4%B8%80%E9%81%93%E9%98%B2%E7%BA%BF/</guid>
      <description>深入剖析Write-Ahead Log(WAL)机制的设计哲学与实现细节。从1992年ARIES论文到PostgreSQL的Full Page Writes、MySQL的Doublewrite Buffer、SQLite的WAL模式，系统梳理不同数据库如何解决torn page问题。基于学术论文与源码分析，揭示WAL如何在性能与可靠性之间取得平衡——Steal/No-Force策略的选择、Group Commit优化、Checkpoint机制与恢复流程。</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fsync()不是你想的那样：数据库持久化的致命误解</title>
      <link>https://answer.freetools.me/fsync%E4%B8%8D%E6%98%AF%E4%BD%A0%E6%83%B3%E7%9A%84%E9%82%A3%E6%A0%B7%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%BA%93%E6%8C%81%E4%B9%85%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E8%87%B4%E5%91%BD%E8%AF%AF%E8%A7%A3/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 04:46:52 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://answer.freetools.me/fsync%E4%B8%8D%E6%98%AF%E4%BD%A0%E6%83%B3%E7%9A%84%E9%82%A3%E6%A0%B7%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%BA%93%E6%8C%81%E4%B9%85%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E8%87%B4%E5%91%BD%E8%AF%AF%E8%A7%A3/</guid>
      <description>深入剖析fsync()系统调用的真实行为与陷阱。从2018年PostgreSQL的fsyncgate事件，到USENIX ATC 2020关于fsync失败恢复的学术研究，系统梳理Linux文件系统(ext4/XFS/Btrfs)在fsync失败后的复杂行为——页面被标记为干净、错误只报告一次、重试反而成功。揭示为什么&amp;#34;重试fsync&amp;#34;是错误策略，以及PostgreSQL、MySQL、SQLite等主流数据库的应对方案。</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
